Comments on: Google Knol – Google Finally Gets into Content http://blog.auinteractive.com/google-knol-google-finally-gets-into-content AU Interactive - Internet Marketing Tips and Observations Wed, 08 Sep 2010 21:24:46 -0400 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Markus http://blog.auinteractive.com/google-knol-google-finally-gets-into-content#comment-1614 Markus Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:58:45 +0000 http://blog.auinteractive.com/google-knol-google-finally-gets-into-content#comment-1614 Since Wikipedia already ranks for everything, it will probably continue to do so, but Knols could appear right alongside, pushing everyone else down. I disagree that roles of authors are unimportant. I'll take a small number of experts over "the masses" anyday (for most topics I care about). Since Wikipedia already ranks for everything, it will probably continue to do so, but Knols could appear right alongside, pushing everyone else down.

I disagree that roles of authors are unimportant. I’ll take a small number of experts over “the masses” anyday (for most topics I care about).

]]> By: robojiannis http://blog.auinteractive.com/google-knol-google-finally-gets-into-content#comment-1615 robojiannis Mon, 17 Dec 2007 18:43:41 +0000 http://blog.auinteractive.com/google-knol-google-finally-gets-into-content#comment-1615 But do you really think Knol poses a threat to wikipedia (wikipedia being the main competitor)? The role of the author (Knol says it wants "...to highlight authors") is not such an important aspect in the social web (nor in the web in general). And apart from that, will a number of experts provide better information than the collective wisdom? But do you really think Knol poses a threat to wikipedia (wikipedia being the main competitor)?
The role of the author (Knol says it wants “…to highlight authors”) is not such an important aspect in the social web (nor in the web in general).
And apart from that, will a number of experts provide better information than the collective wisdom?

]]>